This post from Prakash made me think about the changing marriage system in India.

Still there are lots of arranged marriages happening in India. Majority prefer the arranged marriages. But these days, bride and groom are not compelled to marry someone whom they don’t like and the family decides upon. There are rare exceptions though. It happens in the high-class or low-class. And this is mostly because of one reason – Money. Middle-class bride and groom have more freedom compared to the other two classes in the society.

Another trend is arranged love marriages. The guy/gal just doesn’t fall in love blindly. First he/she would see how wealthy the other one is and then would “fall in love”. Such love affairs have the blessings of the family also. And then they get married in the traditional ways with dowry and stuff.

There is inter-religious marriage that is happening these days. In the last two years, 4 of my friends got married this way. 3 Christian friends (I hate to classify them on the basis of religion, but this to give you a better understanding of what I am talking about) married their Hindu lovers. 1 Hindu friend got married to a Christian girl. In these cases the wives had to accept their husbands’ religion. Hindu girls converted to Christianity and Christian girl converted to Hinduism. They say they were happy to do that because they thought it is always the best to follow the hubby’s religion to avoid any issues in the future. (What say, you girls?)

There are love marriages where the guy and gal are of the same religion too. So far all these guys are happy. I had a discussion about this with a friend if mine and we argued on some points. The youngsters have a different way of thinking and we think we are liberal. However, the society is in the same old way, especially the elder ones.

So these were the points:

When an inter-religion marriage is happened in a family, when he/she is married to someone from another caste or religion, and suppose he/she has a younger sister who would be the next bride from the family, this younger one wouldn’t get any good proposals from good families. This happens mostly in the case of women. Men are safer in this male dominated society.

Second, after the inter-married couples have a child, the problems will arise. An example was an Iyengar woman married a Christian and they lived happily after, but until a child was born. The wife was following the Christianity upto that time, but after the baby was born, she wanted to do the “upanayanam” to their child and wanted to take him to the temples. The man agreed for he didn’t want to create it as an issue and now the boy goes with Amma (mother) to temple and with Achan (father) to the church. The boy is a bit confused about which way to follow.

Another problem is created by our law. We have to fill out the columns of religion and caste in any official documents. So when a child needs to get admission in a school, and his parents still keep arguing on which belief their son should follow, what would he fill up in the form?

So now this leads to the talk whether we should demand the law should allow us to live on our own without having to fill the forms mentioning our religion and caste.


DiggIt Del.icio.us Technorati Spurl Google BlinkList Blogmarks reddit Simpy Yahoo! Myweb Furl StumbleUpon

16 comments

  1. Vijay Ramamurthi // 4:31 AM, July 21, 2005  

    Good one,
    I think our constitution already gives us this freedom, and also of equal oppurtunity(atleast in paper)

  2. Narayanan Venkitu // 6:19 AM, July 21, 2005  

    Interesting thought, interesting and confusing lists of confusions in the end.

    Religion - They should never ask this question anywhere Birth certificate to Death Certificate. Hope it happens soon.

    Naming children/ following beliefs etc..have been made confusing thanks to all our religions...of course it can't be helped.

    As long as the guy and the girl are happy that's fine..I think.

    Acceptance from society is another issue.!

    Time will change everything. Things are a lot better these days than my days.! Though the stigma of love marriage is still there.!

  3. Adaengappa !! // 9:06 AM, July 21, 2005  

    Jo,First time here thru Mr.Narayanan..

    I appreciate your way of thinking !! Keep coming more !!Kudos !!

  4. Jo // 12:08 PM, July 21, 2005  

    @Vijay -- Thanks for stopping by. I am not quite sure whether the constitution allows it, because here we still have to fill out the official forms with religion and caste.

    @Narayan_Venkitu -- I'm hoping for the same bro. Yes, things are a lot different from the old days. And I hope the changes will be on-going.

    @Adengappa (Prabhu) -- Thanks for the visit. And thank you for the comments!

  5. kaleidoscope // 5:22 PM, July 21, 2005  

    I wish we come to a point where no questions are asked about our religion, but will that happend with the reservation system we have based on religion/caste. I feel its a long way to go till then.

  6. Jo // 5:33 PM, July 21, 2005  

    @Kay -- That’s a good point you made here. The religion/caste system should be eliminated from our minds at first. And then from the system. Or else the racial discrimination issue will still remain for the reserved castes/tribes.

    The present reservation system is also wrong. Un-deserving people get into high positions while the deserving high-caste people being threw out. Isn't that also called racial discrimination?

  7. sen // 11:17 PM, July 21, 2005  

    jo
    Think i have already talked a lot on these topics in my blogs.
    When we are talking of eleminating caste systems fully.We should forget reservations on caste basis.Reservations could be there based on economical reasons.

  8. Jo // 12:12 AM, July 22, 2005  

    @Senthil -- Thats a good suggestion. Low can do that, but the people still should not be thinking about the caste system.

  9. Vijay Ramamurthi // 3:13 AM, July 22, 2005  

    Yeah I never said it is in existence, it is in paper.

  10. Bobby // 11:14 AM, July 22, 2005  

    Interesting post, Jo.

  11. Ganesh // 10:33 PM, July 22, 2005  

    Interesting post Jo
    in my family the boy is in love with syrian christian, both sides have issues . But girl father is adamant that only syrian christian will be his S-Law.
    so these things happens.

  12. Jo // 10:52 PM, July 22, 2005  

    @Bobby -- Thanks pal.

    @Ganesh -- That's interesting. Yes, things happen such as this even now.

  13. IBH // 1:02 AM, July 23, 2005  

    by god's grace I had a smooth sail there..well not of inter religion mine though ! but an inter state, inter caste one!

    but I guess it is upto th eparents and the kids , how they form their relationship! how they talk it out..how they make them convince..

    lots to go..jo i wuldnt go deep in to it..i tis individual way of handling!

  14. Jo // 1:30 AM, July 23, 2005  

    @IBH -- I hope everything will get changed in the coming days. But the people shoudl give up their ego first.

  15. dfg // 1:17 AM, July 24, 2005  

    Hi
    Jo
    Sorry i was late on my comments. Anyway the point about the forms, is a good one.
    I think forms should not ask for religion, nationalty, caste etc even i would say sex......
    people should be judged on their abilities to the relevant work not by those I mentioned above
    Nice one keep writing
    Prakash

  16. Jo // 10:58 AM, July 24, 2005  

    @Prakash -- Thanks for your comments. I doubt whether we should exclude the nationality. :-) Isn't it related to one's identity?